🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.